[NYTr] Bitter Legacy of War in the Pacific, Atomic Bombings

[All the News That Doesn't Fit]

sent by Rick Kissell

Los Angeles Times - Aug 6,2007

Letters to the Editor



Letters from Mindanao

The misery and resentment of the war in the Pacific that 
led up to the bombing of Hiroshima 62 years ago today.

By David Smollar
August 6, 2007

The United States leveled Hiroshima with the atom bomb on Aug. 6, 1945, 
but the history-making news didn't reach the Philippines until two days 
later. American troops there, like my father, were waiting 
apprehensively for plans to invade the Japanese home islands.

"It's almost too good to be true," he wrote my mother on Aug. 8 from 
Mindanao, where he was an Army field hospital doctor supervising public 
health measures for Filipinos malnourished after years of Japanese 
occupation. "The news we've been given describes a veritable Buck Rogers 
mechanism of destruction that is capable of erasing any city or nation. 
. . . For the first time, I feel that the war may end shortly and we can 
all go home, and I hope to God it's so."

By the next day, he was far more guarded but remained optimistic, noting 
further details about the atomic weapon and news that the Soviet Union 
had actively entered the war against Japan. "It's damned fortunate that 
we were first in its military use and it may -- and probably will -- be 
the final all-important factor in ending this awful war."

Then he penned a sobering postscript: "There is still something 
frightening about the new bomb, a weapon that truthfully is not pleasant 
to contemplate and that bodes danger for our future if human beings 
don't quit acting like apes. The world had better come to its senses 
after this one."

These past months, in reading my father's 300-plus letters written 62 
years ago, I realized that this endnote was no accident. More than joy, 
the cautious relief that framed his response to news of the wonder 
weapon was his coda to many months of correspondence about the corrosive 
aspects of war and the contradictions that fighting entails.

Less than three weeks before Hiroshima, he had written: "After almost 
four years in the army, I hate war, not in an objective way but as a 
very personal thing. When I hold a bullet in my hand or stare at a 
mortar, it's a feeling that in this inanimate metal is the degradation 
of the human race, a precision-made missile containing all of the 
world's hate."

In his missives, my father had been scathing about "slick news stories" 
that my mother clipped and included in her daily letters, saying their 
glamorized tales of war bore no resemblance to combat. "The GI letters 
that I read as a censor are not only more eloquent than all the magazine 
stories but are so different as to make the latter ridiculous."

While treating wounded infantrymen on Leyte in early January 1945, he 
wrote that every GI asks, "When is this war going to end and when can I 
go home?" At home, Americans had been told that Leyte was secured and 
that soldiers were mopping up Japanese army remnants. "The words are so 
misleading. The fighting is often more vicious and severe after the 
generals say the battlefield is 'secure.' I'll never again be able to 
tolerate a war movie or political speech on military heroes, not after 
seeing newly dead American GIs come in on litters, spotting them from 
the wounded by seeing the undisturbed flies on their yellowish-white 
still skin, or whatever is left anatomically. Seeing the newly dead 
tells me that war prevention is the real job."

Adding to the misery were the thousands of Filipino refugees with 
chronic diseases and many without enough food. Supplies were never 
sufficient, even for the bountiful U.S. Army, to take care of all the 
civilians. Yet from time to time, my father wrote of a stubbornly 
resilient humanity during war. When his unit left Leyte in early May for 
Mindanao, "a truly poverty-stricken mother of a child we had saved 
sought me out for personal thanks and a present of a dozen fresh eggs. 
Her family and those of many others lined the road in a collective 
'good-bye' wave."

And there were the situations bringing forth black humor. He recounted 
an order in early June from higher-ups to establish two whorehouses, 
"one for whites and one for colored, to stem the trouble and venereal 
disease that comes in all theaters when the G-Is want their women. . . . 
I am to take care of the medical angle and must meet with the C.O. 
[commanding officer], the M.P. officer and a 'madam.' So do I make small 
talk and ask 'How's business?' "

But little masked his lament at death and disease everywhere. When 
hearing American planes overhead on their way to smash Japanese still 
fighting in the Mindanao hills, he confessed, "I should exult, I know; 
the Japs have asked for the slaughter and deserve a complete defeat, yet 
I'm more or less confused in my emotions: war and its causes are so 
complex and sometimes, I fear, all is so futile."

To mid-July news about Congress considering postwar mandatory military 
training for all young men, he wrote to my mother, "I wonder why no one 
has suggested that Congress pass a law for one year's compulsory 
training in peace?"

On the morning of Aug. 15, 1945, when Japan's offer of surrender was 
made public, my father watched dozens of warships in Macajalar Bay blow 
their whistles and fire smoke shells in an impromptu celebration. "I am 
emotionally limp, so long have I hoped for the end to this wasteful 
existence called war," he wrote. "I will think of nothing but our 
soon-to-be reunion."

[David Smollar, a former Times reporter, lives in San Diego.]