[NYTr] 9/11 6 Years Later: More Toxic Dust from Ground Zero

All the News That Doesn't Fit nytr at blythe-systems.com
Mon Sep 3 01:43:03 EDT 2007


[Also see NYCOSH's regular updates, which have excellent coverage of the
mess at Ground Zero and former/current workers' issues. (see
resources at the end )-NYTr]

Toward Freedom via World War 4 report - Sep 2007
http://ww4report.com/node/4366

 
NYC: HEALTH HAZARDS RISE FROM DUST OF GROUND ZERO

by Al Huebner
Toward Freedom

In his column of July 19th in the New York Daily News, Juan Gonzalez
reported that the polluted air at Ground Zero seems to have claimed two
more victims. The story adds to his chronicle of how heroes of events
following the attack on the World Trade Center — and just ordinary
people — were harmed by those who should have been protecting them.

On June 22, Fred Ghussin, an Arabic-speaking detective in the Manhattan
district attorney's office, who had worked on all of the city's biggest
Middle East terrorist cases over nearly two decades, died at the age of
58. Three days later George Allen, 47, a former inspector with the
federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration, succumbed in
Denver after a two-year battle with colon cancer.

Ghussin and Allen never met but each was convinced that his illness had
the same origin — exposure to toxins in lower Manhattan after 9-11. In
Ghussin's case the New York City retirement system agreed. Last
November the system's board ruled that his cancer had been caused by
on-the-job exposure and awarded him an accident disability pension.
Allen, who spent just a week at Ground Zero after 9-11, had monitored
the safety of many rescue and recovery workers. He died while still
locked in a battle to overturn the federal government's denial of his
application for workman's compensation. Both Ghussin and Allen said
they started suffering respiratory problems immediately after spending
time at or near Ground Zero.

In the hours following the terrorist attacks on the WTC, firefighters,
police, and emergency medical technicians performed acts of enormous
courage. Many of them died while performing these heroic deeds, and
many more were exposed to health-threatening substances. Unfortunately,
while bureaucrats were unctuously praising these heroes, irresponsible
and deceptive post-attack actions by some officials paved the way for
more illnesses and deaths among workers and residents in Lower
Manhattan. "What happened here is at the level of Watergate," charged
Dr. Marjorie Clarke, scientist-in-residence at Lehman College in New
York and an expert on toxic emissions.

Clarke's charge is quoted in Gonzalez's book Fallout, the product of
his in-depth investigation of initial handling of the WTC collapse. He
turned up outrageous disregard for the health and welfare of rescue
workers, residents, and others, raising fears that these people would
pay a terrible price. Accumulating evidence, including the experience
of Ghussin and Allen, shows that the price has been tragically high,
and will continue to rise far into the future.

Although it took some time to be completed, a 2003 report by the
Inspector General (IG) of the EPA confirmed abundant but scattered
unofficial observations that the agency often misled New Yorkers about
the risks that the collapse of the WTC buildings posed to their health.
But the most shocking revelation was that the EPA suppressed warnings
about the deadly pollution at White House direction. Reflecting on the
IG's report, Joel Shufro of the New York Committee for Occupational
Safety and Health (NYCOSH) concluded that it "clearly places
responsibility on the White House for the sickness of thousands, if not
tens of thousands, of workers and Lower Manhattan residents."

Despite reassurances from federal, state, and city agencies —
unquestioningly accepted by most local press — that the air and water
were safe, a significant number of people began to suffer from
respiratory and other health problems, as displaced workers and
residents returned to their jobs and homes near the disaster site. A
few nongovernmental organizations made measurements of contaminant
concentrations that contrasted sharply with agency assertions. In
Fallout, Gonzalez reported that air-monitoring tests by a team from the
University of California at Davis revealed air pollution levels worse
than during the oil fires in Kuwait after the Gulf War. The UC Davis
scientists recorded these levels one mile north of the WTC, at a
station that wasn't even in the path of the path of the prevailing
winds.

Fallout describes the thousands of rescue workers as abandoned heroes,
praised yet treated as so much expendable fodder. Gonzalez notes "top
city and federal officials failed to enforce even the most basic health
and safety procedures at the World Trade Center site for weeks and even
months." By continuing to classify the Ground Zero operation as an
emergency rescue effort, Mayor Rudolph Giuliani kept operational
control in his hands, so that the city was able to ignore federal and
state laws regulating health and safety procedures.

With Giuliani receiving constant media accolades for his "management"
of the crisis, federal and state officials were unable or unwilling to
confront the mayor on the city's lack of compliance with safety laws.
Similarly, they neglected to confront Giuliani's failure to properly
monitor indoor air quality in the rest of Lower Manhattan. Remarkably,
the area's councilwoman, Kathryn Freed, denied permission by City Hall
to conduct independent environmental testing in a few buildings, had to
sneak a team of scientists past police barricades. They found several
instances of extremely high asbestos contamination.

No matter. With the creation of the myth of Giuliani as a great leader,
he was named Time magazine "Person of the Year," made an honorary
knight by the Queen of England, even nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize.
His presidential aspirations received an enormous boost.

Even before the IG's report Dr. Stephen Levin, medical director of the
Mount Sinai Center for Occupational and Environmental Health in New
York, had responded skeptically to a National Public Radio reporter's
statement about EPA tests after the attack. The agency mentioned that
dangerous pollutants in and around Ground Zero were either
non-detectable or below established levels of concern. "Well, they were
wrong," said Levin. As the IG confirmed, the tests didn't measure for
lead, pulverized concrete, or many other toxic materials that were
released.

When the EPA did give reasonable warnings, the White House's Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) compelled changes that endangered public
health. In one of its first post-attack press releases the EPA stated
accurately, "Even at low levels the EPA consider asbestos hazardous in
this situation." That was changed to read, "Short term, low level
exposure to asbestos of the type that might have been produced by the
collapse of the World Trade Center buildings is unlikely to cause
significant health effects." This is precisely the opposite of the
original.

The person in charge of the CEQ was James Connaughton, an industry
lawyer who previously represented some major corporate polluters. "You
can definitely blame the president," concluded Gonzalez. "Connaughton
and the people from the Council on Environmental Quality refused
requests from the EPA Inspector General to be interviewed on their role
or on who gave them the order to do what they did."

Another example of White House interference was its insistence that
instructions about having nearby residences cleaned by professional
crews be removed from a release. (Cleaning up the contamination left by
the attack was a recurring matter of conflict.) Following months of
public outcry after September 11, the EPA finally agreed to do a
clean-up, but only of residential apartments and only when people
requested it. The IG's report deplored this approach, maintaining that
buildings have to be cleaned as systems. If there is central air
conditioning, for example, and only some apartments are cleaned, the
pollution can travel back into the cleaned apartments.

Furthermore, businesses that conducted their own tests found intense
levels of dioxins, asbestos, and other dangerous pollutants. In
response, the IG report recommended that some commercial buildings as
well as residences had to be cleaned. But many cleaning workers,
residents, and employees were already experiencing chronic health
problems, joining those lauded as heroes after 9-11. Medical screenings
revealed that about half of the police officers, firefighters, EMTs,
and construction workers at Ground Zero have illnesses caused by their
unnecessary exposure to toxic dust and fumes.

In response to the recommendations for thorough clean-up, the EPA noted
that this would cost a lot of money. That contrasted sharply with
President Bush's promise of ample assistance issued shortly after the
attack. In fact, he told New York Senator Charles Schumer that the city
had a "blank check." But that was before huge tax cuts for the rich,
and deceitful and expensive military adventures abroad, combined to
plunge the economy into record deficits that will extend far into the
future.

Later reports by medical groups commissioned by NYCOSH that have been
screening victims of the pollution, along with an in-depth
investigation by the Sierra Club that picks up where the IG's report
left off, add to the catalog of health-threatening deceptions and
outrageous failures to act. The Sierra Club report, for example,
revealed the presence of some especially virulent pollutants, the EPA's
failure to acknowledge them, and its gross negligence in protecting
people.

According to the Sierra Club report, the EPA website claimed that the
agency found no polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) "in any air
samples," although four independent tests found them at high levels.
Even the EPA's own research scientists reported in a scientific journal
that they found PAHs at levels worthy of "the most serious kind of
concern." (PAHs are cancer-causing chemicals that may also produce
genetic effects.)

The Sierra Club report elaborates on how deceptions about the presence
of toxic substances were made much more health threatening by the
failure of federal agencies — the EPA and also FEMA of Katrina
notoriety — to assure proper clean-up of residential buildings and
workplaces. Officials of these agencies advised residents to clean up
the contaminated dust themselves with wet rags, and even discouraged
then from wearing safety masks. This brought residents into contact
with a plethora of toxic substances including dioxins, PAHs, asbestos,
and lead. The latter, present in much of the dust, is a special threat
to young children in whom lead poisoning can cause permanent brain
damage and a spectrum of other problems.

The cleanup of workplaces was bunged just as badly as the cleanup of
homes. The FEMA-funded EPA indoor cleanup program completely excluded
non-residential buildings. Many employees did their best to clean their
own work areas, although some reportedly were forbidden even to wear
safety masks on the job.

In short, employees in inadequately cleaned workplaces face the same
hazards as residents in inadequately cleaned homes. In both cases the
witch's brew of contaminants that may be left behind is an ongoing
health hazard.

Betrayal of the original victims of the attack on the WTC was made more
reprehensible by the many betrayals that followed. White House
deceptions and the failure of city and state officials to protect the
public added significantly to the death and disease that resulted. This
amounts to a second, albeit homegrown, terrorist attack, one so
criminal that Dr. Clarke's reference to Watergate seems like a
considerable understatement.


This article first appeared Aug. 28 in Toward Freedom
http://towardfreedom.com/home/content/view/1110/1/

RESOURCES:

Shocking victims of 9-11
by Juan Gonzalez
New York Daily News, July 19, 2007
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/07/19/2007-07-19_shocking_victims_of_911-1.html

EPA Misled Public on 9/11 Pollution
Newsday, Aug. 23, 2003
Online at CommonDreams.org
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0823-03.htm

New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health (NYCOSH)
http://www.nycosh.org/

See also:

9-11's HIDDEN VICTIMS
New York's Hero Rescue Workers Face Kafkaesque Nightmare
by Joe Flood
WW4 REPORT, June 2006
http://ww4report.com/node/2026

>From our weblog:

NYC: new health threat at Ground Zero
WW4 REPORT, Aug. 21, 2007
http://ww4report.com/node/4319


Reprinted by WORLD WAR 4 REPORT, Sept. 1, 2007
Reprinting permissible with attribution



More information about the NYTr mailing list