[NYTr] Myanmar: Washington's geopolitics and the Straits of Malacca

[All the News That Doesn't Fit]

Workers World - Nov 1, 2007 issue
http://www.workers.org/2007/world/myanmar-1101

Myanmar: Washington's geopolitics and the Straits of Malacca

By Sara Flounders

Attempting to understand George W. Bush’s concern for the people of
Myanmar means looking beyond his statements at the U.N. General
Assembly that “Americans are outraged by the situation in Burma” and
that attempting to impose a new round of economic sanctions is because
he “only desires peaceful change in Burma.”

How is it possible for the Bush administration to be on the same side
as a popular or progressive struggle, while threatening the planet with
World War III and conducting criminal wars of occupation that has cost
more than a million Iraqi and Afghan lives?

What has received little attention in the U.S. corporate media is
Myanmar’s geopolitical position and its rich resources. A U.S. base in
Myanmar is considered vital for control of the most strategically
important sea lanes in the Pacific.

Remember that the U.S. government actively supports, arms and defends
dictatorships like those in nearby Thailand and Pakistan. U.S.
imperialism’s record overthrowing popular and democratic governments in
Iran, Congo, Chile, Guyana and many other countries shows that
Washington has never promoted democratic change except as a cover for
direct intervention.

Straits of Malacca— chokepoint of Asia

Eighty percent of the oil shipped to China’s booming economy passes
through the Straits of Malacca, the shortest sea route for oil coming
from West Africa and the Persian Gulf to the South China Seas. The oil
is also essential for economies and industries of Japan, Malaysia,
South Korea and the other East Asian countries.

The southern tip of Myanmar is strategically situated on the western
entrance to the Straits of Malacca. This funnel shaped waterway, which
narrows to 1.5 miles between Indonesia and Malaysia, links the Indian
and Pacific Ocean. More than half of the oil tankers in the world ply
this route.

According to F. William Engdahl, author of “A Century of War:
Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order” and the Web site
www.engdahl.oilgeopolitics.net, more than 12 million barrels in oil
supertankers pass through this narrow passage daily.

Engdahl explains that the Pentagon has been trying to militarize this
region since Sept. 11, 2001. The Pentagon claims this is essential for
defense against terrorist attacks and pirates. It would also give the
Pentagon unilateral control of the main route for China’s energy supply.

In November 2003, Xinhua News Agency quoted President Hu Jintao warning
that China needed to develop a strategy because some big countries were
attempting “to control the transportation channel at Malacca.”

The Wall Street Journal of Oct. 7, 2005, explained China’s growing
apprehension. “The U.S. is the only power with sufficient naval forces
to enforce a blockade of the 900-kilometer waterway that borders
Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia.”

According to Energy Bulletin, Oct. 3, the Chinese government is so
concerned about China’s vulnerability to U.S. control or blockade of
the straits that it is now building a strategic China-Myanmar oil and
gas pipeline 2,300 kilometers (1,460 miles) across Myanmar, from
Myanmar’s deep water port at Sittwe in the Bay of Bengal to Kunming in
China’s Yunnan Province, where an oil refinery will be built. This
would allow China to bypass the Malacca Straits entirely.

It is noteworthy that the sanctions against Myanmar that the U.S. tried
to push through the U.N. Security Council would block “new”
construction of a transit pipeline. The vast Chevron and Total S.A. oil
corporation’s investments, however, would be free of all U.N. and EU
sanctions or restrictions because their agreements with Myanmar are
“grandfathered” in.

Adm. Muller on surrounding China

On Oct. 18, the new chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Michael
Mullen, described the Pentagon’s plans to look beyond their
deteriorating position in Iraq and Afghanistan to “refocus the
military’s attention beyond the current wars to prepare for other
challenges, especially along the Pacific rim and in Africa.”

Mullen, speaking at a news conference with Defense Secretary Robert
Gates at the Pentagon, also described the need to be prepared for
high-intensity wars against “larger adversaries.” Mullen said, “I
recognize that the military budget is higher now than it has ever been”
but “I would see that in the future as an absolute floor.”

The Pentagon’s new strategy of “forward positioning” calls for
establishing sites where U.S. forces can store equipment and from which
they can come and go as needed. Fearful of their own angry populations
and the anti-U.S. climate, all the countries of the region initially
denied the Pentagon basing rights.

Hiding behind ‘humanitarian relief’

The U.S. Pacific Fleet moved back into South Asia by providing
emergency relief during the Dec. 26, 2004 tsunami near Indonesia.

Using the cover of tsunami relief, the U.S. Navy also moved back into
the giant U-Tapao base on the Gulf of Siam in Thailand. This had been a
major front-line U.S. base during the Vietnam War, from which the
Pentagon launched 80 percent of its air strikes against North Vietnam.

After the tsunami emergency passed, the elected government in Thailand
wanted the U.S. Navy to leave. A U.S.-supported military coup in
September 2006 overthrew the elected government, abolished the
parliament, revoked the constitution and established a military
dictatorship. This was considered a major setback for democracy in the
region.

Unlike the response of the corporate media to the current military
crackdown and censorship in Myanmar, there was barely a mention of the
coup or the total news shutdown in Thailand. Armed soldiers stood guard
in TV newsrooms, and more than 400 community radio stations in the
north and northeast of Thailand were closed. The dictatorship even
blocked BBC, CNN and other Western news broadcasts.

There were no complaints from the Bush administration then and no calls
for international sanctions. The U.S. State Department merely expressed
the hope that elections would again be organized in the near future.

One of the dictatorship’s first acts was to allow the U.S. Navy use of
the U-Tapao Base.

At the same time, the Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group NINE (CSG-9)
moved into Banda Aceh, Indonesia’s Sultan Iskandar Muda Air Force Base
at the entrance of the Straits of Malacca, across from Myanmar. Navy
ships arrived to provide tsunami relief. The U.S. military said that
they were unable to predict when they will be able to withdraw their
“resources” from the region.

The U.S. Navy Seventh Fleet’s USS Gary made the first U.S. visit to
impoverished and underdeveloped Cambodia in more than 30 years, landing
at the Ream Naval Base near Sihanoukville. The U.S. Navy is expanding
the base so Ream can receive more warships and navy personnel. A U.S.
intelligence base is being built on the Cambodian island of Koh Tang in
the Gulf of Thailand.

Although the military dictatorship in Myanmar has complied with many
imperialist demands for greater access to its once nationalized
resources, it is an unstable repressive regime that understands that
there is a 150-year history of opposition to colonialism, and
especially to British imperialism, among Myanmar’s population. Fearful
for its own survival, the regime has been unwilling to grant U.S.
military bases. This has frustrated the Pentagon’s plans for the region.

Even though Chevron and French oil corporation Total S.A. have reaped
enormous profits from the Yadana gas concessions in Myanmar, they are
interested in helping to overturn the regime if they could secure even
greater access and more lucrative terms.

Next: The people of Mynamar and the history of the popular struggle.

Articles copyright 1995-2007 Workers World. Verbatim copying and
distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without
royalty provided this notice is preserved.

Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww at workers.org
Subscribe wwnews-subscribe at workersworld.net