[NYTr] NarcoNews on the Yucatan Crash of Mysterious Drug Plane

[All the News That Doesn't Fit]

Many previous reports from Mad Cow Morning News are listed
here:

Pilot of Crashed Drug Plane: "Don's $2 Million Bought the Plane"
http://blythe-systems.com/pipermail/nytr/Week-of-Mon-20071022/070535.html

[See original story at Narconews for embedded links to sources.]

NarcoNews - Nov 17, 2007
http://www.narconews.com/Issue47/article2885.html

Mysterious Jet Crash: Rare Portal Into the “Dark Alliances” of Drug War

Paper Trail for Cocaine-Filled Plane that Crashed in Yucatán 
Suggests Link to U.S. Law Enforcement Corruption in Colombia

By Bill Conroy
Special to The Narco News Bulletin

The Gulfstream II aircraft that crashed on the Yucatan Peninsula
outside of Cancun in late September while laden with some four tons of
cocaine has been the subject of considerable media and blogger
attention in recent weeks.

Some reports have alleged the errant plane was previously used between
2003 and 2005 by the CIA for several flights to the infamous U.S.
“terrorist” prison camp in Guantamano Bay. The fact that the ownership
of the aircraft apparently switched hands twice within weeks of the
crash, helping to obscure its ownership, has only further fueled media
and Internet speculation that the jet’s illegal payload was being
transported as part of some larger U.S. government black operation.

All that might be true — or not.

But Narco News has uncovered at least one fact that is certain to
deepen the mystery surrounding the crash of the jet whose tail number,
N987SA, is now affixed in the lexicon of CIA folklore. That fact
revolves around the name Greg Smith, who was identified in a McClatchy
Washington Bureau report on the Gulfstream II’s crash as follows:

    A bill of sale obtained by McClatchy Newspapers indicates that
Florida pilot Clyde O’Connor bought the plane on Sept. 16 — eight days
before it went down in the Yucatan jungle. Another Florida pilot,
identified by his license number and signature as Greg Smith, also
signed the document, but his relationship to O’Connor isn’t detailed.

But before we introduce you to the mysterious Mr. Smith, it is
important in all of this to remember that a proposition is not
automatically a corollary of a seemingly related fact.

Too many conspiracy theories rest on a proof built on the
six-degrees-of-separation premise — that any person on the Earth can be
connected to anyone else through a chain of no more than five people.
That might be true, and can make for an interesting trail to follow,
but it doesn’t prove the first person in the chain even knew the last
person — let alone that all six individuals acted in a conspiracy.

As the late, great authentic journalism heavyweight Gary Webb, who did
meticulously investigate and link CIA activities to illicit drug
running, once said:

“I don’t believe in conspiracy theories. I believe in conspiracies.”

With that understanding in mind, it is important to review the timeline
of the Gulfstream II’s demise in the Yucatan peninsula— as reported by
other media.

The plane took off from Ft. Lauderdale Executive Airport headed for
Toluca, outside Mexico City, on Sept. 18. It crashed near Cancun,
Mexico, on Sept. 24 after departing from Rio Negro, Colombia.

Mexican publication Por Esto!, whose work on the story has been
exhaustive, with some 30 stories to date, and based on solid
journalism, reported that the jet was headed to an airport in Cancun,
but arrived shortly after a work-shift change at the airport. The
security people on the new work shift did not authorize the Gulfstream
II to land, so it flew to an airport in the Yucatán capital of Merida,
which also would not authorize a landing.

The jet remained stranded in the air until it ran out of fuel and was
forced to make an emergency landing in the hills by the nearby town of
Tixkokob, Por Esto! reported.

Mexican authorities apprehended one of the pilots onboard the
Gulfstream II a couple days later, about three miles from the crash
site. Four days later, they apprehended a man alleged to be the
copilot, though Por Esto! has questioned why none of the helicopters or
other high-tech search equipment available were mobilized to find the
two more quickly. Por Esto! also claimed that the amount of cocaine at
the crash site appeared to be much more than the 3.7 metric tons
authorities reported.

Also of importance to this story is the ownership trail of the jet
itself. McClatchy reported that a Florida-based company called Donna
Blue Aircraft, which is supposedly owned by two Brazilian men, acquired
the Gulfstream II from a company connected to New York real estate
developer William Achenbaum.

That deal was allegedly cut on August 30. Donna Blue then flipped the
jet to a new owner, for a supposed payment of about $2 million, on
September16.

That’s where the enigmatic Greg Smith comes into the picture, as one of
the supposed co-signers on the bill of sale drafted by Donna Blue for
the Gulfstream II. Media reports to date have followed the trail of his
supposed partner in the deal, Clyde O’Connor, and even delved into the
background of Achenbaum, but the trail on Smith seems to be cold.

Where could he be — and who is he anyway? Smith is not exactly a unique
name, even in the insular world of the private-jet industry.

Well, it turns out that Narco News has run across the trail of at least
one Greg Smith who has plenty of experience flying between southern
Florida and Latin America — for the U.S. government.

The Vega Connection

Baruch Vega is a colorful Colombian who has worked as an asset for the
FBI, DEA and CIA, among other agencies, over the years.

Vega was very involved with a series of U.S. law enforcement operations
carried out by the DEA and FBI between 1997 and 2000. Those operations,
Vega claims, involved brokering deals with Colombian narco-traffickers
by offering them the bait of U.S.-government sanctioned plea deals in
return for their surrender or cooperation.

The following is from a lawsuit filed recently in federal court by
Vega, in which he alleges the government failed to pay him for his
high-risk services, to the tune of some $28.5 million:

    Once Mr. Vega introduced … American lawyers to the Colombian
targets [the narco-traffickers], the lawyers would then get retained
and then take over as legal representatives for the Colombian targets
and further deal with a group of United States law enforcement agents
and prosecutors, hand-picked to work out deals for the Colombian
targets. A particular United States Attorney for the Southern District
of Florida became the coordinator of this “recruiting effort.”

So Vega is in a position to know the lay of the land in the Colombian
narco-trafficking scene — which is the source of the four tons of
cocaine found on the crashed Gulfstream II jet. After all, coca plants
don’t grow well in Mexico.

According to Vega, between late 1997 and 2000, he traveled between
South Florida and South America via a private jet for a total of some
25 to 30 “recruiting” trips— some with FBI agents on board, some with
DEA agents on board, and some transporting Colombian narco-traffickers
who were being brought back to the United States to negotiate deals.

Vega claims that the main pilot for all of those flights was none other
than an individual named Greg Smith.

Here’s how Vega described the situation to Narco News in a recent
interview.

    Well originally… I met Greg Smith… we needed a pilot, a very
trustful pilot, someone we could trust to bring in the [Colombian] drug
traffickers to surrender. Then the members of the FBI recommended to
get in contact with this guy [Smith] because he was very close to them.
Ever since we flew only with him.

    Everything was with him. … I never asked anything [about Smith’s
background]. But he [Smith] brought a couple of pilots because we
always have two pilots in the plane. He occasionally brought pilots
from the US Customs.

    I tell you one thing. We flew with Greg Smith easily 25 to 30
times. All [the] operations [were] between the end of 1997 to 2000.

When Vega was asked if federal agents were on board the jet during
those trips, he responded:

“Oh yes, many times. If you read the flying manifest, there were… DEA
agents in the plane and of course drug traffickers who were coming to
surrender with attorneys.”

Vega adds that the FBI and DEA were each running their own separate
operations at the time, so the FBI also was involved in some of the
confidential source recruiting trips to South America as well, and he
says the Bureau “even paid for the [leased] plane a few times.”

A judge’s ruling in another legal case that is related to Vega’s
pending lawsuit, in fact, backs up his claims. It describes the CIA’s
involvement in one flight in 1999 that departed from Panama for Florida
that involved Vega, federal agents and an indicted, fugitive Colombian
narco-trafficker:

    Indeed, the appellant [a DEA supervisor] used the CIA to bring Mr.
Cristancho to the chartered aircraft surreptitiously, without going
through Panamanian airport security or customs. The appellant simply
made no attempt to conceal the use of the chartered aircraft. And, an
Assistant U.S. Attorney and various DEA agents from Group 9 were at the
Fort Lauderdale airport to greet the plane.

And those same legal pleadings mention the name of the company from
which Vega chartered the aircraft: Aero Group Jets.

    On or about November 17, 1999, the appellant [a DEA supervisor]
received an invoice from Aero Group Jets in the amount of $23,200 for
the rental of the aircraft used to transport Mr. Cristancho.

Vega also confirmed that Smith’s company was called Aero Group Jets.

A check of the public records available through Florida’s Department of
State lists the registered agent/officer of that now inactive company
as Gregory D. Smith.

So it would seem that the real question now is whether the Greg Smith
who allegedly signed the paperwork in the purchase of the crashed
Gulfstream II jet, as reported by McClatchy, is the same Greg Smith who
was recommended by the FBI, according to Vega, to pilot more than two
dozen flights to Latin America between 1997 and 2000 as part of
U.S.-sanctioned law enforcement operations.

One reporter known for his spook-related journalism claims to have
already interviewed the right Mr. Smith, but, by his own admission, it
was through a third party — which leaves open the possibility of all
sorts of shenanigans, particularly if we are dealing with real CIA
spooks.

Another reporter with a Florida weekly also claims to have interviewed
the real Mr. Smith. However, as it turns out, when Narco News contacted
that individual, he stressed that the reporter had gotten the wrong man.

“I was falsely written up … and they named my company,” says Greg
Smith, who is with a company called Global Jet Solutions of Pembroke
Pines, Fla. “There’s probably three or four Greg Smiths in aviation in
South Florida. But it’s not my name on the bill of sale [for the
Gulfstream II jet that crashed in Mexico on September 24].”

This Smith, who says his middle initial is “J,” adds that he has hired
an attorney to explore legal action against the publication that he
alleges wrongly identified him and his company.

Narco News did obtain a copy of a 2007 document that contains the
signature belonging to the Greg Smith of Global Jet Solutions. That
signature does appear to be different than the signature of the Greg
Smith contained on an annual report filed with the state of Florida in
1998 by Aero Group Jets — the firm Vega claims he leased a jet from
during his many trips to South America between 1997 and 2000.

So it appears, at least for now, a cloud of mystery still conceals the
whereabouts of the right Greg Smith — whom McClatchy reporters contend
was a co-signer on the bill of sale for the ill-fated Gulfstream II Jet.

Many possibilities

Now, before anyone jumps to conclusions, it is important to point out
that every crashed plane has its own unique story — as does every drug
deal gone bad. And most don’t all involve grand CIA conspiracies
directly linked to the White House — though as Gary Webbs’
investigative reporting on the CIA/Contra/Crack connection showed,
those “Dark Alliances” do surface from time to time.

But for the sake of argument, let’s explore some more mundane theories.

For example, the Gulfstream II jet’s crash landing in the Yucatan might
simply be a drug-smuggling run gone bad, with no mystery beyond that
reality.

Or it is possible that the jet that crashed outside of Cancun was under
surveillance as part of a government operation known as a controlled
delivery — in which government agents allow a load of drugs to make its
way to the destination (under close scrutiny) with the goal of
arresting those who take delivery of the narcotics in the United
States. If that’s the case, the fact that the jet crashed after getting
waived off of two airports tells us only that something went wrong,
that the operation was not “greased” properly, in law enforcement lingo.

As for Vega, and several former federal law enforcement sources
interviewed by Narco News, both the notion that the Gulfstream II was
part of a U.S. government-sanctioned controlled delivery operation, or
that it was part of some kind of CIA black op, are both viewed as being
on the low side of probability.

However, at least one law enforcement source with experience working in
Latin America did say: “I wouldn’t put anything past those guys [the
CIA]. … They aren’t even supposed to be there [in Latin America]
officially, so if anything did show up [related to their operations]
they would deny it.”

Vega weighed in on the questions as follows:

    … I believe more it could be a run [by narco-traffickers] because a
controlled delivery is very easy. A controlled delivery would make the
plane land … remember how close the Keys are to the Yucatan Peninsula
or any airport in Miami. And if it’s a controlled delivery by your
government, that plane could land anywhere basically. Or at least land
in one place until they call the agents and come and clear the whole
thing. That’s why I could say more it looks like a run for one of the
traffickers.

    … Again, that’s what I say [in terms of the allegation that it was
a CIA black operation], that’s what doesn’t make sense because let’s
assume the Agency is running that thing, they could land in Guantanamo,
they could land anywhere in the Keys or in Florida and wait an hour or
two until someone calls from somewhere, and then don’t worry. That’s it.

But there also are other possible explanations as to the Gulfstream’s
possible connections to U.S. intelligence or law enforcement that fall
more squarely into the chaos of human vice —such as greed and official
corruption.

With that in mind, it might be worth reviewing some past cases where
human virtue seems to have gotten twisted up a bit in pursuit of the
drug war.

Money for nothing

At the top of the list is the case of the Bogota Connection, which was
exposed by a Justice Department memo drafted in 2004.

Vega was very involved with some of the U.S. law enforcement operations
referenced in the memo. Those particular operations played out between
1997 and 2000 and sought to snare narco-traffickers with Colombia’s
infamous North Valley Cartel. Remember, Vega claims an individual named
Greg Smith, during that same time period, was retained as a pilot to
fly numerous missions — for both the DEA and FBI — that were, in
essence, confidential-source recruiting trips.

In the course of that work, Vega alleges, corrupt U.S. agents in
Colombia seriously compromised his role as a government asset and that
a number of his informants within Colombia’s narco-trafficking
underworld were assassinated as a result.

Justice Department attorney Thomas M. Kent wrote the memo in late 2004
in an effort to draw attention to alleged serious corruption within the
U.S. Embassy in Colombia. In the memo, Kent alleges that DEA agents in
Bogotá are on drug traffickers’ payrolls, complicit in the murders of
informants who knew too much, and, most startlingly, directly involved
in helping Colombia’s infamous rightwing paramilitary death squads to
launder drug money.

The first of the major allegations in Kent’s memo centers on a DEA
undercover operation launched in Colombia in 1997 called Cali-Man,
which made use of Vega as an asset. The operation was overseen by David
Tinsley, a DEA group supervisor in Miami.

As part of Cali-Man, Tinsley and the agents working under him uncovered
evidence that DEA agents in Bogotá appeared to be assisting
narco-traffickers in Colombia. In one case, Tinsley’s group, as part of
a sting, obtained a classified document from the U.S. Embassy in Bogota
via a narco-trafficker turned informant.

After Narco News exposed the Kent memo in a story published on Jan. 9,
2006, DEA reacted by describing the corruption allegations in that memo
as “extremely serious.”

However, some nine days later, after Semana, a popular weekly magazine
in Colombia, published a story about the Kent memo, DEA issued another
public statement describing the corruption allegations as “unfounded.”

The U.S. mainstream media has been silent about the Kent memo, and the
Bogotá Connection, since that time.

It is not to be ignored, in the case of the Gulfstream II jet crash in
Mexico, that the flight allegedly left from Rio Negro, Colombia, just
outside Medellín, where it managed to avoid that nation’s customs and
law enforcement scrutiny while loaded up with at least 132 bags of
cocaine that tipped the scales at four tons.

In any event, Vega says his work in Colombia for the DEA and FBI did
produce results — despite the alleged treachery on the part of U.S.
agents in Bogotá and elsewhere

“All in all, Mr. Vega convinced and successfully recruited about 114
Colombian targets to enter this plan/program, about 25 of which were
fugitives at the time of negotiating the deals,” his lawsuit alleges.
But, in the end, the U.S. government, he contends, failed to compensate
him for his work and risks as promised.

(For more on Vega’s lawsuit, go to this link.)

But the allegations of U.S. law enforcement corruption that have
surfaced in the Bogota Connection are not new in the history of the
drug war, for those who care to follow that trail.

For example, in the early 1990s, according to court pleadings in a
criminal case filed in New York, DEA agents transported a large
quantity of heroin from Pakistan to New York City, via commercial
airlines, allegedly for the purpose of setting up undercover stings.

However, the defendant in the litigation, Gaetano DiGirolamo, who is
now serving a life prison sentence, claims he is not guilty of the
charges brought against him in 1991; in fact, he claims that DEA agents
framed him, seeking to use his case as a cover for their own illegal
drug-smuggling activities.

Among the claims raised in a post-conviction petition filed by
DiGirolamo was that he was convicted “based upon perjury of three DEA
agents.”

“(The DEA agents) testified that they were involved in importing drugs
for use in ‘stings’ against me and others when in truth and in fact
they were doing so for their own personal, criminal enrichment,”
DiGirolamo states the post-conviction petition.

The petition goes on to raise major doubts about the veracity of the
DEA agents’ purported sting against DiGirolamo — such as the fact that
the alleged heroin brought in from Pakistan was never tested to assure
it was the same heroin used in the sting, nor was the heroin ever
produced at trial.

In addition, despite claims by the DEA agents involved in transporting
the heroin that their operation had been sanctioned by DEA headquarters
in Washington, D.C., as well as the French and Pakistani governments,
DiGirolamo’s attorney, law professor Steven B. Duke, says those
approvals were never produced.

“Where are they?” Duke asks in a court filing. “Where are the
applications for such approvals? Where is the evidence that any of
these approvals were sought, much less obtained?”

The DEA agents, of course, contend Duke’s allegations are baseless.

Still, it is clear that federal agents did transport 20 kilos of heroin
from Pakistan to New York via commercial airlines — a fact to keep in
mind the next time you are flying the friendly skies.

The U.S. Customs Service sent Duke a letter on May 2, 2000, in reply to
his queries about the incident. The response was prepared by Bonnie
Tischler, then assistant commissioner for Customs’ Office of
Investigations. (Customs is now part of the Department of Homeland
Security.)

>From Tischler’s letter to Duke:

    Dear Mr. Duke,

    Thank you for your March 3, 2000, letter regarding the importation
of narcotics into the United States by law enforcement officers.

    … The specific incident you cite involved the international
controlled delivery of 20 kilograms of heroin at the John F. Kennedy
(JFK) Airport on Dec. 4, 1990. Our records indicate that while our
agency provided assistance in facilitating that delivery through JFK,
the entire operation was initiated and coordinated solely by the DEA.
Therefore, I would refer any further questions you my have regarding
this matter to DEA Headquarters, 600 Army Navy Drive, Arlington,
Virginia 22202.

    I appreciate your interest in the Customs Service. If we may be of
any further assistance, please contact me …

In yet another case in the late 1990s involving the U.S. Customs
Service, federal agents in South Texas were accused of letting an
informant — a drug-running pilot — bring tons of cocaine into the
country unchecked as part of an effort to snare an alleged drug kingpin.

“Well, it was like a 007 license. I didn’t know the government did
that. It was hard to resist,” the smuggler, Rodney Matthews, told ABC
News – Primetime in a 1998 interview.

Customs officials denied that Matthews was allowed to smuggle drugs
into the country. However, Mark Conrad, who at the time headed U.S.
Customs Internal Affairs in Houston, told Primetime a different story:

    We got in bed with Rodney Matthews and the importation of a
humongous amount of narcotics coming into the United States. … The
reason is there’s a great deal of pressure on agents in the field to
make cases, to make the big one. And the bigger, the better. … We hide
things. We cover them up. We don’t — we’re not honest at times within
our own organization, and we’re clearly not honest at times with the
media. … It would never be officially condoned. You’ll never find any
policy that approves of it, but it happens routinely in virtually every
situation where you’re dealing with informants.

Welcome to the drug war. Will the real Mr. Smith please stand up?

Stay tuned...